Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Jordan Medical Journal ; 56(2):115-133, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2169017

ABSTRACT

Background Since the onset of SARS-CoV-2, this novel virus has been the focus of many studies seeking to improve the ability of healthcare systems to withstand pandemics against it. COVID-19 has pulmonary and cardiovascular implications, but its ocular effects remain a subject of debate. Objectives The objective of our narrative review is to explore the ophthalmic manifestations of COVID-19, identify research gaps, and act as a guide for further research in the field. Methods The literature search involved original studies published from January 1, 2020, up until August 20, 2021, on the PubMed database. Title and screening and full text review were conducted by two independent researchers, with a third researcher resolving conflicts. Studies that met the set inclusion criteria were used for data synthesis. Results The preliminary search generated 59 articles, with 25 being data extracted. Conjunctivitis, epiphora and ocular irritation were consistently stated anterior segment manifestations. Posterior segment implications were mostly subclinical, including cotton-wool spots and retinal nerve-fiber layer thinning, but some cases were more detrimental, such as central retinal vein occlusion, posterior segment inflammation, retinal hemorrhages, and fungal infiltration. RT-PCR tests were unreliable in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in ocular tissues, potentially due to methodological limitations. Conclusion Anterior segment findings were significant manifestations of the novel coronavirus, but a clear resolution of posterior segment findings is yet to be made. In the absence of reliable COVID-19 ocular sample tests, all links made to SARS-CoV-2 etiology remain tentative;further research must be directed to the field with modified testing strategies. Copyright © 2022 University of Jordan,Deanship of Scientific Research. All rights reserved.

2.
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ; 81:1701, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2009140

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic continues worldwide and has had a strong impact on public health. As the pandemic evolves, efforts have been inten-sifed to identify persistent symptoms associated with the infection once resolved have intensifed. Objectives: We aimed to describe persistent symptoms and sequelae in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) after admission due to Covid-19. We also compared the role of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) with that of non-autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (NARD) in persistent symptoms and sequelae. Methods: We performed an observational study of patients with RMD who attended a rheumatology outpatient clinic in Madrid and required admission to hospital due to Covid-19 (1st March-30th May 2020) and survived. The study began at discharge and ran until 1st October 2020. The main outcomes were persistence of symptoms and sequelae related to Covid19. The independent variable was the RMD group (ARD and NARD). The covariates were sociode-mographic data, clinical fndings, and treatment. We ran a multivariate logistic regression model to assess the risk of the main outcomes by RMD group. Results: We included 105 patients, of whom 51.5% had ARD and 68.57% reported at least 1 persistent symptom. The most frequent were dyspnea, fatigue, and chest pain. Sequelae were recorded in 31 patients. These included lung damage in 10.4% of patients, lymphopenia in 10%, central retinal vein occlusion (1 patient), and optic neuritis (1 patient). Two patients died. Eleven patients required readmission owing to Covid-19 problems (16.7% ARD vs 3.9% NARD;p=0.053). No statistically signifcant differences were found between RMD groups in the fnal models. Conclusion: Many RMD patients have persistent symptoms, as in other populations. Lung damage is the most frequent sequela. Compared to NARD patients, ARD patients do not seem to differ in terms of persistent symptoms or sequelae, although ARD patients might generate more readmissions due to Covid-19.

3.
Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology ; 11(1):11-18, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1798537

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been the most challenging health problem in the last 2 years. Post-COVID-19 multisystem inflammatory syndrome of children (MIS-C) is a severe post-COVID-19 complication in pediatric patients. Ocular manifestations may be the first presentation of MIS-C, wherein prompt treatment may improve outcomes. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the acute and sub-acute ocular manifestations in pediatric patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Methods: We included all online primary studies, with no language restriction and published between January 1, 2019 and November 18, 2020, reporting any acute or sub-acute ocular manifestations in children with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. PubMed/MEDLINE was searched using the following MeSH and Emtree terms: “eye,” “ophthalmologic,” “ocular,” “vision,” “conjunctivitis,” “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,” “SARS-CoV-2,” “corona,” “2019-nCoV,” “COVID19,” and “COVID.” The eligibility and quality of the selected records were assessed by two independent reviewers as per the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review. Results: A total of 1,192 records were identified electronically. Seven papers were extracted from the reference lists of the eligible records. Thirty-six papers met the inclusion criteria and were categorized into two subgroups according to acute or sub-acute presentation of ocular manifestations. Among 463 pediatric patients with COVID-19, 72 (15.5%) had acute ocular manifestations. There was one patient with central retinal vein occlusion and another with photophobia and diplopia associated with meningoencephalitis. Among 895 pediatric patients with post-COVID-19 MIS-C, 469 (52.4%) had ocular manifestations, which only included non-purulent conjunctivitis. Conclusions: Ocular manifestations have been reported in less than one-fifth of pediatric patients with acute COVID-19. Furthermore, conjunctivitis was the only ocular manifestation reported in half of the patients with MIS-C, and it may be missed easily due to its non-purulent nature. During the COVID-19 pandemic, pediatricians and health workers must remain vigilant for early detection of signs of this potentially fatal post-COVID-19 inflammatory syndrome.

4.
Journal of Investigative Medicine ; 70(2):570, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1707033

ABSTRACT

Case Report We report here a case of a 26-year-old woman at week 29 of a pregnancy who was transferred to our hospital for OBGYN care after on the same day she presented to an outside facility for one day of vaginal bleeding. At the transferring facility she was noted to be hypertensive with concerns for pre-eclampsia, acute kidney injury and non-reactive nonstress test. She had not had any pre-natal care or screenings done. Upon arrival she was normotensive but became obtunded and emergently taken to the OR. She was found to have a 50% placental abruption with uterine atony, hemorrhaging, and unfortunately fetal demise. She tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on screening though she had no initial respiratory symptoms. Following extubation, she was noted to have very labored breathing, continued disorientation, and repeatedly stated that she was blind. She was subsequently re-intubated both to protect her airway and due to her work of breathing. Chest imaging showed bilateral patchy opacifications of her lungs and she was initiated on treatments for COVID19 pneumonia. She was lymphopenic at this time with an absolute lymphocyte count of 800 cells/mm. She had not been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Over her hospitalization, she underwent extensive workup. For her complaints of vision loss she underwent ophthalmologic exam which did not find uveitis or other changes consistent with syphilis but rather for ischemic central retinal vein occlusions. She had persistent hypoxic respiratory failure and ultimately necessitated tracheostomy due to prolonged dependence of mechanical ventilation support. Approximately 1 month after her hospitalization, she developed a new left lower lung opacification as well as scattered tree-in-bud nodular findings on chest CT imaging. On bacterial and culture workup she grew methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus as well as Aspergillus species (identification still pending). She was treated with a short course of cefazolin for bacterial pneumonia and was started on a 3-month course of isavuconazonium sulfate for probable COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). After a two-month long hospitalization, she had gradual clinical improvement and was transferred to a skilled nursing facility for long-term care. In this case, the devastating impact of COVID-19 disease in a young, unvaccinated, and pregnant woman is clearly seen, as are multiple sequelae. She unfortunately lost her pregnancy and developed severe visual impairments and several opportunistic respiratory infections. Her placental abruption, ischemic retinal vein occlusions and pulmonary aspergillosis were all felt to be directly attributable to her COVID19 disease. The case presented here serves as a cautionary tale that even the young are at risk for severe COVID-19 disease. Healthcare professionals should continue to advocate for screening and vaccination for these high-risk individuals.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL